HISTORIOGRAPHICAL BASIS OF THE FORMATION OF THE EUROPEAN SCHOOL OF WEAPONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2786-5118/2024-45-5Keywords:
Boheim, Petersen, Burton, Krechmar, Thirtbach, munitions, encyclopedia of weapons, bladed weapons, military equipment, classification of weapons, military-historical research.Abstract
Arms science is a separate historical discipline that was formed in the XIX–XX centuries. The European school of study was born through the interest of a certain number of like-minded people and is quite unique compared to the Asian school. The school was founded in the 19th century by former soldiers. The purpose of the research is an attempt to analyze the path of development of the historiographical foundations of the formation of the European school of weapon science and line them up in chronological order; to analyze the role of Ukraine in this process and its impact on Ukrainian science. Methodology: in the formation of the methodology of this study, a number of different elements of modern methodological systems, as well as general and special scientific methods, were used. The combined nature of the methodology of this research made it possible to draw a certain number of conclusions on the problem of studying the historiographical foundations in the formation of the European school of historical weaponry. Results: The proposed article examines the works of outstanding historians of the 19th-20th centuries. which influenced the development of historical weapon science. An analysis of historiographical sources was made, thanks to which a chronological line of the development of historical weapons science was drawn, the principles of the formation of the discipline were shown, and specific individuals and the goals and achievements of their research were considered. The article examines the role of the association of the study of historical weapons and costume in the development of the discipline of historical weaponry and its influence on this process. The article reports on Ukraine's contribution to the formation of a separate historical discipline of weapon science, namely the publication of Tiktor as a continuation of the European school of studying weapons of the past. The article reveals the influence of Begheim, an outstanding Austrian scientist, on weapon science. In the study, a comparative analysis of publications was made, the issues and current relevance were considered. Conclusions: this study fully illuminates the main factors of the formation and development of historical weapons science - a discipline that was born thanks to a number of former military officers who plunged into science. The development of historiography was determined by the interest of the scientific community of Western and Northern Europe. Ukrainian science, which was not yet under the influence of Soviet censorship, at the beginning of the 20th century published a significant study, continuing the European traditions of the historiographical development of weapons science and military history in general. The importance of the formation of historical weapon science is undeniable for understanding the issues of concepts and classification of weapons from ancient times to the present.
References
Заболотна І. Історіографія життя та наукової спадщини І. П. Крип’якевича. Історіографічні дослідження в Україні : зб. наук. пр. Київ : 2007. Вип. № 17. С. 201–217.
Кирпичников А. Н. Мечи и сабли IX–XIII вв. Древнерусское оружие. Москва – Ленинград : Наука. 1966. Вып. 1. 142 с.
Крип’якевич І., Гнатевич Б., Стефанів З., Думін О., Шрамченко С. Історія українського війська (від княжих часів до 20-х років XX ст.). Упорядкування Б. Якимовича. Вид. 4-те, змін. і доповн. Львів: Світ, 1992. 713 с.
Миллер Ю. А. Арсенал Эрмитаж. История и современность. 1764–1988. Москва : Искусство. 1990. 368 c.
Alheidis von Rohr. Waffen- und Kostümkunde. Rückschau und Ausblick. Die Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Historische Waffen- und Kostümkunde e.V. 1896–1996. Band 38, Nr. 1. Otto Schwartz & Co., Göttingen 1996. 192 р.
Andrea Rottloff: Archäologen (Die Berühmten). Philipp von Zabern, Mainz 2009, 208 р.
Bergljot Solberg. Jan Greve Thaulow Petersen. Universitetet i Bergen. Store norske leksikon. 2023. Retrieved from: https://snl.no/Jan_Greve_Thaulow_Petersen. January. 05. 2024.
Brodie Fawn M. The Devil Drives: A Life of Sir Richard Burton. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. 1967. 410 р.
Ewart Oakeshott. The Archaeology of Weapons: Arms and Armour from Prehistory to the Age of Chivalry. Martlesham. Boydell Press. 1960. 200 p.
Karl Koetschau. Moritz Thierbach. Zeitschrift für historische Waffenkunde 4, 1908. P. 156–158.
Karl Koetschau. Wendelin Boeheim. Zeitschrift für historische Waffenkunde 2, 1902. P. 131–134.
Kennedy Dane. The Highly Civilized Man: Richard Burton and the Victorian World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 2005. 354 р.
Ludwig Biewer, Eckart Henning. Wappen: Handbuch der Heraldik. Böhlau Verlag Köln Weimar. 2017. 382 р.
Michael Loads. Swords and Swordsmen. Barnsley: Pen and Sword Books. 2010. 494 р.
Oskar Regele. Böheim, Wendelin Josef. Neue Deutsche Biographie (NDB). Band 2, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. 1955. 367 р.
Wendelin Böheim. Handbuch der Waffenkunde. Das Waffenwesen in seiner historischen Entwickelung vom Beginn des Mittelalters bis zum Ende des 18. Wiesbaden: Fourier Verlag, 1985. 570 р.
Wilfried Tittmann: Der Neubeginn von Verein und historischer Waffenkunde im Berlin der Nachkriegszeit – Zur Vita von Heinrich Müller und Helmut Nickel. Waffen- und Kostümkunde. Band 62, Nr. 2. Sonnefeld: Louis Hofmann. 2020. P. 175–192.