Peer review procedure

Submitted the article to editorial office of South Аrchive (Historical Sciences), it is subjected to a double-blind review: reviewers do not know who is an author, the authors do not know who is a reviewer.

The review is carried out by one of the members of the editorial board, who is a respected expert in knowledge related to the subject of the submitted paper.

Impartial reviewers carefully evaluate the quality of the manuscript.

In the process of reviewing, reviewers evaluate the quality of work based on:

- compliance with the structural requirements of a scientific article;

- compliance with editorial conventions: titles, summaries and references must be clear, informative, accurate, complete, the authors must be identified according to institutional affiliation and address;

compliance with the technical requirements for publication of the article in the journal.

After reviewing the authors receive a letter of confirmation relatively the article acceptance for printing.